Category Archives: Teaser

Obsessed (April 24)

[imdb tt1198138]Watching the trailer for Beyonce Knowles’ new film, Obsessed, is about par with snorting smarties.  The film doesn’t look like anything worth seeing in the first place, so a hit off the trailer is just as worthwhile as going to see the movie itself.  Especially since the preview shows the entirety of the plot, going so far as to show the ultimate reduction of the two female leads dissolving into an utter hair-pulling, claws-bared, teeth snapping girl fight.  The only things the trailer doesn’t show are the paddling pool filled with chocolate pudding and Idris Elba sitting on the couch, shoveling popcorn into his mouth.

While I have now seen this trailer more than dozen times, I must say that I was tired of it halfway through the first viewing.  The Fatal Attraction element of the film is revealed almost instantly.  Fair enough; essentially it is what the movie is about.  Then we see exactly how the formerly gap-toothed Heroes star insinuates herself into a scandal that shatters all of the hero’s credibility.  Okay…usually that is a twist reserved to surprise the audience, but it’s also a very common plot point used in thrillers.  They want the audience to empathize with the poor, misunderstood main character, so I guess that spoiler can be forgiven, also.

However (note the pause), I cannot, by any means, forgive showing the audience the sudden switch of protagonist from Elba to Knowles.  Don’t change your trailer’s premise mid promo!  I’m with Elba, for the first half.  He’s obviously a middle-aged man, bored with his marriage and money, but we all can understand the yen for a little excitement in our lives.  I am with him, mentally and emotionally, when this little voyeuristic indulgence gives off mixed signals and gets a little hinky.  Against my will, I am still with him when the gorgeous cousin of Alex Forest (Glenn Close), entraps him in her spikey little web of deceit.

So, why on earth would you, as the trailer author, break that flow, that confidence and connection the audience has with the hero, to not only give away the exciting climax of the film, but also switch horses mid-stream and try to force us to start caring about what happens to this other character that has been hounding her husband throughout the trailer.  How idiotic!  I don’t care about Knowles’ character.  You give us the film from strictly Elba’s point of view, set the wife up as a friction causing element, she is emasculating, jealous, suspicious, untrusting.  So why would we, the audience, suddenly switch our loyalty.  No don’t get me wrong, if the trailer was from Beyonce’s point of view, I’d be all for seeing little miss thang kicking some blonde bimbo ass; however, we see this world from Idris Elba’s point of view, so technically, we are supposed to want to side with him, through good and bad, or else there will be no point to sit through the two-hour film.

I know this seems like a small, tedious problem to have with the trailer, but the fact is, the story-telling of the trailer is downright shitty.  It makes for a very messy view of the plot.  I am slowly realizing that a lot of people do not watch movies for the same reasons or in the same manner that I watch them.  Most people are not as demanding or critical as I am.  However, I refuse to ignore glaring problems simply because everybody else will.  There should be a set standard that trailers need to live up to, even if it is only in my mind.

P.s. Ali Larter may be smokin’, but that does not hide the fact that she walks like John Wayne.

Rating: ½ 

The Princess and the Frog (Dec 11)

[imdb princess and the frog]  Okay…I’ve been excited about this film since it was first announced…what, two years ago?  For one, The Frog Prince story is one of my favorite fairy tales.  For two, I lived in New Orleans for a few years during my impressionable years, and I still have very fond memories of the French Quarter, the mardi gras float museum, and king cakes with little plastic babies sawed in half.  Okay, they aren’t perfect memories…but they’re mine, okay?

Anyhoo…this is also Disney return to hand drawn animation!  Not that there’s anything wrong with CG, but there is nothing prettier than hand drawn cells, in my opinion.  Lastly, it’s about damn time there was an Black Princess.  Damn straight.  The closest we have had up until now was Nala from Africa who was a freakin’ lion.  Princess Tiana has had an arduous journey to get to this point…she’s had like three different names, two different occupations, lots of concept art…but here she is now, in all her sassy splendor.  I would mention the stereotype about the sassy black woman…but most Disney princesses are sassy in SOME way.  Belle is my favorite, and she tamed a beast, so I think we can forgive Tiana that personality trait.

Disney is a little shaky when it comes to being politically correct.  Most cartoons are.  Children’s (adults’ as well) brains work on a level where it is much easier to marginalize certain traits.  We see Speedy Gonzales and Slow-poke Rodriguez…and they are very stereotypical characters…animators took certain traits that are recognized in large groups of Mexican people (as seen through our white washed perspectives) and marginalized them, and packaged them into easily recognizeable characters.  For those of us that are not familiar with different cultures…we can see Speedy and say “Mexican.”  Then when we watch, say, The Three Cabelleros, we look at a character and say “Mexican.”  That is where cliche and stereotypes come from.  As long as it’s not insulting, it’s usually for comedic sake and it works well with children’s brains…it’s not necessarily right, but it isn’t going to stop.

That being said, I am slightly concerned about the stereotypes guaranteed to crop up in the Princess and the Frog.  Already, just in the teaser, there is a cajun firefly with bad grammar and teeth missing.  Most likely, if the frog does turn into a prince, he will probably also be African-American…because god forbid there be racial mixing in a children’s movie.  I just wonder where the line is between appeasing the masses and pushing the envelope.  This will probably be a fun sweet movie with beautiful art and amazing voice acting…but how will it differ from other Disney features?  Where is the evolution?  Where is the innovation Disney prides itself on?

Don’t get me wrong, I really want to see this film.  I think it’s kind of lame that Disney bent to criticism about starting Tiana off as a chamber maid.  All of the Disney princesses were chamber maids of some sort.  Cinderella, obviously, Snow White cleaned up after dwarves, Aurora cleaned her little hovel and gathered berries, Belle cleaned up after her dotty father and then the beast.  I also think it’s lame, though, that these heroines can only better their situations by getting married.  How archaic is that?  Tiana not being a maid because she’s black is stupid because you are then saying there is something wrong with being a maid.  I was a maid; I didn’t like it, but I don’t think less of other maids.  However, the fact that the story is about a Princess makes her being a maid a little out of place.  Ignore, of course, the fact that it takes place in Louisiana, where there are no princesses.   All I’m saying is that there are other things wrong with this film, not just the maid issue.

That also being said, Tiana is adorable and I wouldn’t kiss a frog either…even if he promised to turn into a hunk straight out of an Ambercrombie ad.

Rating: ★★★★★☆ 

http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/princessandthefrog/

Where the Wild Things Are (Oct 16)

[imdb Where the Wild Things Are]I think it is a good sign when a trailer leaves you with tears in your eyes.  I am among thousands of readers that can claim Where the Wild Things Are as a classic favorite, so I’m sure I’m not the only person that get goosebumps watching this trailer.  The author did an amazing job of capturing the desperation Max feels that pushes him to take refuge in his imagination.  The little details in his real life juxtaposed with mirrored clips in his imagination gives the viewer a very quick view into the theme of the film.

The song chosen is perfect; the syncapated notes remind me of the part in the book where the wild things and Max dance around their campfire.  The right music can make a trailer flow nicely, and, paired with the video clips, the song can ilicite just the right emotions.  The crecendos in the music are timed nicely with epic moments in the story, like the dark clouds rolling in the crashing of the waves.

The moment in the trailer that gives my heart a little squeeze is the cascade of running clips, with Max in his adorable little wolf suit running away from the camera in different settings.  The small touch shows the breadth of settings in the film.  It also, at once, puts the audience in Max’s shoes, running with him, and makes it so that we feel he is just out of our grasp and we’re racing to catch up with him.  It’s a very cool technique.

I’m super excited to see how this film adapted the book, but just from seeing the few clips in the trailer, I’m bouncing in my seat!  The only thing I can think to criticize is that I know this is just a teaser and there will be another trailer to come…but I wish there wasn’t.  I wish the promotional people would just push the teaser and not spoil the rest of the film as they no doubt will.  What is with trailers having to give away all the good parts?  Is it by demand of the audience, or do trailer authors simply see us as mindless drones.  When it comes to trailers, I think we should leave them as a fine amuse bouche:  a delight to the senses that leaves us hungry for more (which we will eventually get, by shelling out $11-$14 bucks).

Rating: ★★★★★☆